You may know that I have a Facebook Book Club and that I LOVE to read. You probably know that I am more frank than most about things that my Catholic grandparents would never have discussed in mixed company - or likely at all.
And yet I just cannot get myself to read 50 Shades of Grey. Partly it's the Twilight Fan Fiction aspect and partly it's the bondage - which is not my cup of tea - but I just can't get myself to click "Send to Kit's Kindle."
So I was THRILLED when my longtime commenter and dear friend John offered to guest post his review. Please leave a comment and let me know if you agree or disagree with his comments or if, like me, you just can't bring yourself to pick it up.
Note: This is a review of an erotic novel so if you are uncomfortable with explicit sexual terms you may want to proceed with caution.
-----
It's what everybody is talking about these days . . . 50 Shades of Grey the Twilight fan fiction that grew legs of its own and went from a self-publishing oddity to the leader on the Amazon.com charts. And I get pretty angry, with myself, when I hear about the book, and how popular it is, and how much people enjoy reading it. Because, well, I don't think it's particularly well-written and I think know I could do better. 50 Shades is . . . well, I'll call it a "coming of age" story, because there isn't much of a plot. An annoying girl's roommate gets sick, so the annoying girl has to interview the annoyingly rich guy, and she becomes obsessed with him, and he becomes obsessed with her, and they fuck a few times. But he prefers the kinky side and she doesn't like feeling like a whore when he lavishes his richness upon her. And she's not really into the concept of pain being pleasure. Then, they go flying in a plane without an engine, but, unfortunately, don't crash. Seriously - there is no main conflict . . . it's just a diary. My issues with the book are numerous: there are serious grammatical/word-use issues, there are lapses in continuity that I absolutely cannot look past, the characters are wholly undeveloped and unlikable, there is behavior that is laughed at that needs to be dealt with seriously, and, I'll admit it, it's a fucking "sparkly vampire" story1. Actually, let's start with the fact that we're talking about a girl, of modest means, who becomes instant BFF's with her first, very rich, college roommate and is graduating college without any monetary issues and a very well-established palate for wine. I'm willing to accept that reality for the sake of the story. And the first issue I have, that there are grammatical issues, I can almost forgive . . . and I'm an absolute stickler for proper grammar. Basically, I think 50 Shades became a victim of its own popularity . . . it was submitted through fan fiction and became popular. It became popular enough to self-publish, and then it got picked up. This is the dream for most every author on the internet (well, most of us would want to skip the self-publishing step, but, with rare exception, that might not be feasible . . . if a publisher can choose between "something good" and "something guaranteed to sell," they're going to pick the latter, and I can't fault them for that . . . especially since the two are far from mutually exclusive). Because of the path it took, it never received proper editing - and by the time an editor would have looked at it, it was far too popular. Why mess with a good thing? But, then, there are things that I can't look past. I don't want to give too much away in the plot, in regards to the continuity -- but I'll mention the very first thing that bothered me. When Ana & Christian have sex in her college housing, Ana's hands are tied to the bed with a tie, and Christian pulls her t-shirt over her head so that she can't see. Before he fucks her, he takes off his clothes, and she mentions that he strokes his sizable cock before he enters her. The thing is -- she couldn't see. How did she know that he was stroking his cock? Because if he was telling her, it would have been hotter. To know that he was whispering "Anastasia, I'm stroking my cock, imagining how much better it's going to feel once I'm inside you," would have been a vast improvement than what was actually written. Because of this, I read the entire scene of a girl getting fucked, hard, while bound to a bed, scratching my head instead of, well, doing something else with another part of my body. Without a real plot, and with defective story-telling, I'd have been able to get into the story if I could have liked the characters. But, I couldn't. Ana is whiny. She doesn't want to be a whore who, basically, gets paid to have sex . . . yet, she's someone who takes a computer and a cell phone and a car and heads out to fancy dinners while thinking about signing a contract that says "this person can do whatever he wants to me, whenever he wants to do it." Christian is a control freak with completely unpredictable mood swings. He's an impossibly good looking 27 year old tycoon who has some very strange issues, yet closes up like a turtle in his shell whenever you ask him about anything remotely odd. Kate is a bitch who really despises Christian, yet won't really talk to Ana about that resentment, choosing to make Ana uncomfortable in public settings. Ana accepts this from her BFF. There is a single character, Taylor, who appears to be a personal assistant to Christian, and he shows up at just the right place & right time, time & time again. I suspect that he's a ninja . . . or a brainsashed vampire manservant . . . but on the possibility that he's a ninja, I enjoy him. Next, can we talk about stalking a bit? Stalking is not cool, and shouldn't be joked about. I'll admit, when I start reading a new blog that I enjoy, I'll admit to "stalking" the blog author by reading through the archives. If I have a friend on Twitter, I'll "stalk" them by having their tweets texted to me. That isn't actual stalking, just taking what's publicly available & making it more accessible to me. Tracing someone by their cell phone usage? Highly disturbing. Showing up on someone's doorstep for a booty call immediately after a "nice knowing you" email? Troubling. Absolutely refusing to talk about or explain juvenile sexual abuse? Absofuckinglutely a deal breaker. I'd have the police involved, yet these are just accepted truths in the 50 Shades world. Ho-hum. Lastly, I want to scream "yes, we know he's a fucking vampire" time and time again. She's not allowed to touch his bare chest (yet he steadfastly refuses to tell her why, and she just accepts this), he barely sleeps, he has worldly knowledge & talents that seem impossible for a 27 year old. Sure, the sex scenes grab my attention -- but have you just met me? Sex will always grab my attention3. And, lest you think that I'm a prude, and the concept of BDSM sex "just doesn't cut it for me," I've been writing erotic fiction, on and off, for over 12 years . . . currently at John's Dark Side. I have no issue with sex, and I actually think society, as a whole, would be better if we talked about sex more openly. A little boy has questions about sex, but doesn't want to go to his parents because "that's not stuff we talk about," so he goes to his friends, but what they tell him can't actually be true, so he goes to someone he trusts that will actually talk about it . . . his teacher or his priest. I'm know I'm oversimplifying the enormity of child sexual abuse, but if we're more open to talking about sex, we open more avenues for the proper handling of questions & behavior. Ultimately, I think the success of the book is due to readers who, simply, don't know that erotica is out there. Much like Twilight validated the feelings of being a 14 year old girl (or, as the incomparable KLZ writes, Twilight is to literature as a Britney Spears song is to music) . . . 50 Shades validates the darker side to sexual desire - and this is a good thing. Only, well, I wish it were written better. Or, more precisely, I wish that I could have stepped out of my "write one smut scene at a time" shell, turned out a smutty novel. In short, I wish I had written it. I challenge any reader who enjoyed 50 Shaedes to read Anne Rice's Sleeping Beauty trilogy. Or, you know, my dirty blog. Because I do enjoy getting the hits.
I agree with the grammatical issues - really blocked enjoyment for me. However, once I start something, I have to see it through, so I read the remaining 2 books. He's not a vampire. From what I understand, this was Twilight fan fic, but it's been changed to make it more palatable to non-sparkly-vampire fans. The no-chest-touching is a part of the abuse storyline, which was understandable. However, the fact that he's got 400 years of knowledge crammed into a 27 year old brain wasn't really explained. Bottom line for me: this was a vacation read - a book that was mindless, and didn't ask for much out of me. Nothing I'd read again, and nothing that stayed on my Kindle past the first read (and this is coming from someone who's read Sense and Sensibility over 100 times). :)
Posted by: MsMeggiepoo | April 30, 2012 at 09:08 AM
LOVE the Anne Rice "Sleeping Beauty" Series.
Posted by: Tracy | April 30, 2012 at 09:13 AM
i haven't read 50 shades because my friends tried to sell it to me by mentioning the twilight fanfic aspect. i've read enough fanfics in my days to know that most are horrible. and i really hated twilight, so as a selling point, i never wanted to pick it up. also, i love (and own) the sleeping beauty trilogy, and i had a feeling that after reading anne rice's erotica, i wouldn't want to go backwards in terms of quality and content by reading 50 shades of grey.
Posted by: anne | April 30, 2012 at 09:28 AM
I didn't find out it was Twilight fan-fic until after I read it (yeah, I was that much out of the loop). Had I known that going in, I probably wouldn't have read it.
I did enjoy it, despite the fact it was not good literature and poorly written. (I really hate dialogue that includes the endearment "Baby", as in "Laters, Baby". It hardly ever comes across well.) I enjoyed it the way some people enjoy reality TV--with a bit of shame over my less-than-sophisticated taste. :) The sex scenes were hot--the first few times. And then it was just more of the same...I ended up reading the sequels much faster than I read the first simply because I could skip 4 or 5 pages of redundant sex at a time. (Seriously, I've been married 15 years, and our sex life isn't that redundant! Just because it had elements of BDSM-lite doesn't mean it wasn't boring at times.) What I enjoyed was the unbelievable soapy-ness of it, the cliché of good-girl-redeems-bad-boy-they-live-happily-ever-after-ness of it. But I'm a hopeless romantic and I like cheesy romances. And soap operas.
One last thing--I don't think they took his sexual abuse lightly. Ana is clearly disturbed by it and tries throughout the trilogy to get Christian to confront what happened to him. He doesn't see it, and believes he was a willing participant. This is a pretty common victim mentality, and I think it's the one way that the author tries to show just how damaged he is. I was actually more disturbed by the subplot of how much he likes to hurt women that look like his mother. Though the author kept hammering into our heads that he only went as far as the woman told him to, and never caused "unpleasurable" pain, there's still that niggling little thought in the back of my head that if Ana hadn't come along when she did and "rescued" him, he'd end up on a "Criminal Minds" episode.
~Lynn
Posted by: Lynn | April 30, 2012 at 09:57 AM
You wrote your review!! Yay!
There's a really interesting (and important, IMO) review of the book on BlogHer that talks about how the book is a really poor primer for people unfamiliar with BDSM, because the important points of care and trust just trampled by both Ana and Christian. I won't litter Kit's comments with links, but it's worth seeking out.
And the Beauty Trilogy was an eye opener back in day. And literate, yay!
Posted by: Cameron | April 30, 2012 at 10:36 AM
Oh, yes, Anne Rice's Sleeping Beauty Trilogy was phenomenal!
Posted by: Nenette | April 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM
When everybody got so excited about this book/series and how "erotic" it was, I could not help but remember that I have been reading an erotic vampire series that is not romance and have loved it for years! Laurell K. Hamilton's books are amazing and the sex is even better. Granted, during the Anita Blake series, she lost sight of the plot for about 6 books, but she seems to have regained it in the last few books. It is NOT the corny paranormal romance that is so popular right now and it is so hot.
Posted by: Cara | April 30, 2012 at 11:38 AM
Finally!! Someone who feels the same way I do about 50 Shades of Stupid. I prefer my characters to have personalities.
I absolutely the Anita Blake books, she may have gone off plot for a while but her characters still had their personalities and their lives.
I liked the Sleeping Beauty Trilogy as well... it was my introduction to BDSM and Erotica, and what an eye opener it was!!
Posted by: Melissa Stevens | April 30, 2012 at 02:47 PM
I first heard of this on GMA and was intrigued, but not sold immediately. I don't typically buy into the hype of 'best sellers' or 'book club suggestions' unless they are really well written. I like content and characters that are complicated and real. However, curiousity got the better of me and I bought it on my Kindle. I can honestly say, I have read better erotica that has had characters with much more depth and the sex was far more inticing.
My problem with Ana/Christian is how her character unfolds after having sex for the first time and considering she is suppose to be intelligent and has wiated, I find it hard to swallow (no punn intended) that she would be so taken with his character so quickly. It's just so cliche. Now I am going to have to cyber stalk you and read some of your material....
Posted by: Kate | April 30, 2012 at 03:03 PM
Thank you for this review!! I thought I was the only person on earth who wasn't impressed with this book and didn't think it was "hot." Great review!!
Posted by: K Jones | April 30, 2012 at 03:49 PM
Everyone keeps telling me how fantastic this book is. And, I am not gonna lie, I really wanted to pick this book up when I first heard about it, but the reviews are making me not want to read it. I am pretty sure I will pick it up at some point in my life.
However, this Sleeping Beauty trilogy you guys speak of does sound interesting. I will be checking that one out ASAP.
Posted by: Jayla | April 30, 2012 at 04:42 PM
I hadn't heard of 50 Shades until people started reviewing it. And a fan fic that got published? Hmmm. Even weird for a Twilight (book) fan like me. Yes I admit it. :)
Posted by: Kim | April 30, 2012 at 05:22 PM
LOVE, LOVE, LOVE the Sleeping Beauty Trilogy - read it the 1st time over 10 years ago...50 Shades got me to bring them out again, at least it was good for that!
Posted by: Robyn | April 30, 2012 at 08:07 PM
I should have known this book would be shit when my prudish friend was the one to tell me about it breathlessly. In her words it's "porn for chicks". Regular porn is porn for chicks. We don't need a subgenre.
Posted by: Paxochka | April 30, 2012 at 10:53 PM
I'm in the 'can't bear to pick it up' camp. I'm not a sparkly fan. I have an alternate personality named Madame Syntax. And, quite frankly, I'm a rampaging feminist. This book violates all three principles.
I think it's so popular because a whole group of sexually repressed women can read it and pretend not to be all into sex. And I absolutely agree - if sex was less taboo, we'd be a much better culture.
Posted by: Jester Queen | May 01, 2012 at 09:19 AM
I agree with your comments about the ridiculous writing, stupid storyline, etc. However, I think that this series specifically appeals to women as opposed men, which is why you didn't get it. A man writing a review for these books is like a woman writing a review of a power tools how-to documentary. I don't think it appeals to women because we're sexually repressed. In fact, a lot of women I know who've read it, no names here, love to have sex. Like a lot.
With regard to sparkly vampires, et al, there are no vampires in 50 shades. The books were loosely based on the characters of Edward and Bella as a way of exploring their sexual frustration.
Sometimes its fun to look beyond the stupidity and just read for fun. I'm sure, yes, that there's better erotica. For sure, and absolutely, there are better books, but 50 shades is popular because its FUN, its a bit ILLICIT, and it feeds a bit of fantasy into our boring lives. Nothing more, nothing less.
Posted by: mara | May 01, 2012 at 10:14 AM
Read The Story of O
Posted by: Sidney | May 01, 2012 at 11:00 AM
I won't be reading this.
but I do have to say, John. Coming of Age is an actual literary genre called Bildungsroman...and it's legit. Don't call this piece of shit coming of age, well unless it is.
Little Women, Great Expectations, shit, even Catcher in the Rye are "coming of age."
Bildungsroman involves a young person experiencing a conflict that causes them to learn and change.
This doesn't really sound like that.
This just sounds terrible.
Posted by: Katie | May 01, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Everybody has seemingly been talking about this book. Being completely turned off by the Twilight fan fiction aspect of it I haven't read it. Just this past weekend after hearing yet another person talk about it I finally ordered it on amazon and its en route. Reading this review... I sort of wish I hadn't.
Posted by: Marta | May 01, 2012 at 03:08 PM
I'd rather read blogs.
Posted by: julie gardner | May 01, 2012 at 06:11 PM
My "wine palate" extends to- is it under $10/bottle? And it doesn't burn, right? (HATE dry wines.)
And financial worrys,,, oh yeah...
So, that would be the MAJOR problem for me reading that book...
Posted by: Amanda | May 02, 2012 at 06:09 AM
John, I'm disappointed you didn't comment on the "tampon scene". O.O
Full disclosure, I haven't read it and I have no intention of doing so. I've read enough about it online and I sampled the first few pages on Amazon - not for me. There's tons of well written erotic books out there if someone's looking for a hot read. The fact that it's getting attention for the "kinky sex" alone makes me want to cry at the injustice. Aside from that, there's just too much WTFuckery going on between its covers. I'd probably burst a blood vessel by Chapter 5.
Thanks for sharing your link though, John. Now I have someone new to stalk, er, follow!
Posted by: Jenny Lyn | May 02, 2012 at 01:47 PM
"However, I think that this series specifically appeals to women as opposed men, which is why you didn't get it. A man writing a review for these books is like a woman writing a review of a power tools how-to documentary."
AAGH NO WHY WHY WHY YOU MAKE ME CRY?
It would be easy to say, "I'm a woman and I know plenty of women that think these are stupid, stupid books" but that's sort of a cop-out. Really: books targeted towards women shouldn't be critiqued for literary value because, oh, it's for women?
No.
Posted by: Ari | May 05, 2012 at 02:16 AM
Thank you! Thank you! THANK YOU for your review.I almost bought this book but I paused and asked myself, "Is a self published, fanfic based on Twilight really going to be in the same league as Sleeping Beauty?" A quick "50 Shades vs. Sleeping Beauty" search brought me here. I'm off to buy a new copy of Sleeping Beauty.
Posted by: kay | May 08, 2012 at 11:06 PM
I have been ignoring this book, but I heard it reviewed by Elaine Charles on her radio show (www.bookreportradio.com) yesterday, so I thought I better find out more. Thanks for your great review. I now do not need to feel guilty about not reading this book, but I probably will anyway because sex also gets my attention and I need to be able to follow what everyone else is talking about.
Posted by: Samantha | May 14, 2012 at 05:18 AM
I didn't read these books with anything in mind more than an escape from my often mundane stay at home mom duties. Thankfully it provided that & and has opened up many discussions with other moms like me who don't take the time to read much anymore. It was hot, plain & simple! I'll save the well written, great American novels for the empty nest years, thank you very much!
Posted by: Julia Lowcher | May 28, 2012 at 10:22 AM
I tried a few things after Fifty... but the Realtors Series by Liz Crowe was the one thing I found that was as captivating! The relationship between Jack and Sara will draw you in... and ladies Sara is a successful woman with her own career. The other characters in the book are developed over the series, it is enjoyable to watch them all interact.
Here are the Amazon links for this highly recommended trilogy ...
Book One: Floor Time - http://amzn.to/IqDXde
Book Two: Sweat Equity - http://amzn.to/KhcDvf
Book Three: Closing Costs - http://amzn.to/JDXFoD
Posted by: Denise | June 18, 2012 at 08:37 PM
Curious - did you read all 3 books, or just the first one? I managed to get through all 3; they were rough, but I thought 2 was the best, and 3 really wrapped up the "story" and answers a lot of questions that you had.
Posted by: Andrea | July 14, 2012 at 07:07 AM
Yes! Finally someone writes about femdom.
Posted by: Sunny | November 20, 2013 at 04:17 AM